Metaverse and education: which pedagogical perspectives for the school of tomorrow?

Autori

  • Alessandro Soriani University of Bologna, Italy
  • Paolo Bonafede University of Trento, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32043/jimtlt.v3i1.54

Abstract

The large investments from big tech-companies and the vast attention that policy-makers around the globe are concentrating on the concept of metaverse are contributing in making it the “next big thing” in the course of the digital revolution that we will experience in the next decade. This concept, the metaverse, though, is not entirely new. A few decades ago, experiences such as Second Life, video games such as World of Warcraft or Fortnite, or certain social platforms strongly based on para-social interactions (e.g. Twitch) have already provided glimpses of what could be the future scenario of an internet enriched by the metaverse. It is thanks to cases like these that, in this exploratory phase, we can raise meaningful and important questions and reflections about the educational, training and didactic dimension of the metaverse. Which challenges and which opportunity can the metaverse bring to the world of education? What are the next kinds of digital divide that need to be addressed? How could the concept of educational relationship and educational presence change? The contribution intends to answer, with a pedagogical perspective, these, and other questions that the new immersive project proposed by Meta necessarily raises.

I grandi investimenti delle grandi aziende tecnologiche e la grande attenzione che i decisori politici di tutto il mondo stanno concentrando sul concetto di metaverso stanno contribuendo a renderlo la “prossima grande novità” nel corso della rivoluzione digitale che sperimenteremo nel prossimo decennio. Questo concetto, il metaverso, però, non è del tutto nuovo. Qualche decennio fa, esperienze come Second Life, videogiochi come World of Warcraft o Fortnite, o certe piattaforme social fortemente basate su interazioni para-sociali (es. Twitch) hanno già fornito scorci di quello che potrebbe essere lo scenario futuro di un internet arricchito dal metaverso. È grazie a casi come questi che, in questa fase esplorativa, possiamo sollevare interrogativi e riflessioni significative e importanti sulla dimensione educativa, formativa e didattica del metaverso. Quali sfide e quali opportunità può portare il metaverso al mondo dell'istruzione? Quali sono i prossimi tipi di divario digitale che devono essere affrontati? Come potrebbe cambiare il concetto di relazione educativa e di presenza educativa? Il contributo intende rispondere, in chiave pedagogica, a queste e ad altre domande che il nuovo progetto immersivo proposto da Meta necessariamente pone.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Balbi G. (2022), L'ultima ideologia. Breve storia della rivoluzione digitale, Bari, Laterza.

Bentivenga S. (2009), Diseguaglianze digitali. Le nuove forme di esclusione nella società dell’informatica, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

Bertin G.M. (1997), Nietzsche. L’inattuale, idea pedagogica, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1997, pp. 6-7.

Codeluppi V. (2020), L'ideologia neoliberista e il capitalismo digitale. Sociologia della comunicazione 59, (1): http://digital.casalini.it/10.3280/SC2020-059007

CoE (2019a), Recommendation CM/Rec(2019)10 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on developing and promoting digital citizenship education. Strasburg: Council of Europe Committee of Ministers: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=090000168098de08

COE (2019b), Digital Citizenship Education handbook, (J. Richardson & E. Milovidov, Eds.), Strasburgo, Council of Europe Publishing.

Costa Pinto D., Reale G., Segabinazzi R., & Rossi C. (2015), Online identity construction: How gamers redefine their identity in experiential communities, in «Journal of Consumer Behaviour», 14.

Floridi L. (2022), Metaverse: a Matter of Experience, in «Philosophy & Technology», 35: 73-80.

Freeman D., Lambe S., Kabir T., Petit, A., Rosebrock L., Ly-Mee Yu., Dudley R., Chapman K., Morrison A., & O’Regan E. (2022), Automated virtual reality therapy to treat agoraphobic avoidance and distress in patients with psychosis (gameChange): A multicentre, parallel-group, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial in England with mediation and moderation analyses, The Lancet Psychiatry, 9 (5), 375–388.

Friedman T. (2005), Electric Dreams: Computers in American Culture, New York University Press, New York, NY.

Gartner Report (2022), Predicts 2022: 4 technology bets for building the digital future: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220207005085/en.

Kim J. (2021), Advertising in the metaverse, in «Journal of Interactive Advertising», 21 (3), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2021.2001273

Lai J., Widmar N.O. (2021), Revisiting the Digital Divide in the COVID-19 Era, in «Appl Econ Perspect Policy», 43, 458-464. https://doi-org.ezproxy.unibo.it/10.1002/aepp.13104

Lévy P. (1997), Il virtuale, Raffaello Cortina, Milano. Edizione originale pubblicata: 1995.

Li T., Arleo A., & Sheynikhovich D. (2020), Modeling place cells and grid cells in multi-compartment environments: entorhinal– hippocampal loop as a multisensory integration circuit, in «Neural Networks», 121: 37–51.

Messena M., Everri M., & Mancini T. (2019), Are smartphones transform-ing parentchiild everyday life practices? A crossgenerational qualitative study comparing parent’s and early adolescents’s representations. «Media Education – Studi, ricerche, buone pratiche», 10 (1): 1-23.

Min T., Cai W. (2022), Portrait of decentralized application users: An overview based on large-scale ethereum data, in «CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction», 4: 124–141 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-022-00094-6.

Morris B. (2020), Why does Zoom exhaust you? Science has an answer, in «Wall Street Journal» 2020. https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-does-zoom-exhaust-you-science-has-an-answer-11590600269

Moser M.B., Rowland D.C., Moser E.I. (2015). Place cells, grid cells, and memory, in «Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology», 7-21.

NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration) (1999), Falling through the Net: defining Digital Divide: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/legacy/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html

ONU, (2015), Trasformare il nostro mondo: l’Agenda 2030 per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile, Assemblea Generale delle Nazioni Unite, Settantesima sessione punti dell’agenda 15 e 116 Distr.: Generale 21 ottobre 2015: https://unric.org/it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/Agenda-2030-Onu-italia.pdf

Ortega-Rodríguez P. J. (2022), From extended reality to the metaverse: a critical reflection on contributions to education, in «Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria» 34 (2): 1-19: https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.27864.

Pasta S. (2018), Razzismi 2.0. Analisi socio-educativa dell’odio online, Scholé, Brescia.

Rauschnabel P., He J., & Ro Y. K. (2018), Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses, in «Journal of Business Research», 92: 374–384.

ReportLink, 2022. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/02/22/2389001/0/en/Global-Metaverse-Market-to-Reach-US-758-6-Billion-by-the-Year-2026.html

Riva G., Wiederhold B.K., Chirico A. (2018), Brain and virtual reality: what do they have in common and how to exploit their potential, in «Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine», 16: 3–7.

Riva G., Wiederhold B.K., Mantovani F. (2021), Surviving COVID- 19: the neuroscience of smart working and distance learning, in «Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking», 24: 79–85.

Riva G. Wiederhold B. (2022). What the Metaverse Is (Really) and Why We Need to Know About It, in «Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking», 25 (6): 355-359.

Rivoltella P.C., Rossi P.G. (eds.) (2019), Tecnologie per l’educazione, Pearson Italia, Torino.

Rueff J. (2011). Socialisation et reconnaissance dans les jeux de rôle en ligne, in Denouël J., Granjon F.(eds.), Communiquer à l'ère numérique : regards croisés sur la sociologie des usages,collection sciences sociales, Presses des Mines, Paris, 159-190.

Soriani A. (2021), La comunicazione scuola-famiglia mediata da tecnologie: una ricerca-formazione durante la pandemia presso un Istituto Comprensivo di Bologna, in Polenghi S., Cereda F., & Zini P. (eds.), La responsabilità della pedagogia nelle trasformazioni dei rapporti sociali Storia, linee di ricerca e prospettive, Pensa MultiMedia, Lecce, 118 - 128.

Tham J., Duin A.H., Gee L., Ernst N., Abdelqader B., & McGrath M. (2018), Understanding Virtual Reality: Presence, Embodiment, and Professional Practice, in «IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication», 61 (2), 178-195.

Van Dijk J. (2005), The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Van Dijk J. (2020), The digital divide, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Warschauer M. (2002), Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide, in «First Monday», 7 (1): https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/967/888

Wiederhold B.K. (2020), Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: avoiding ‘‘Zoom Fatigue”, in «Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking»; 23: 437–438.

Wyatt S., Henwood F., Miller N., Senker P. (eds.). (2000). Technology and in/equality: Questioning the information society. Routledge, London.

Xi N., Chen J., Gama F., Riar M., & Hamairi J. (2022). The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload, in «Information Systems Frontiers» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10244-x

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2023-02-02

Come citare

Soriani, A., & Bonafede, P. (2023). Metaverse and education: which pedagogical perspectives for the school of tomorrow?. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.32043/jimtlt.v3i1.54