Beyond Adaptivity: A Modular NLP-Driven Framework for Dynamic Learner Profiling and Generative Edu-cational Content
Parole chiave:
Dynamic Learner Profiling, Generative Educational Content, NLP in EducationAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) is rapidly transforming the education landscape, enabling both teachers and students to benefit from new forms of personalization. However, systems that aim to be adaptive are often tied to, and therefore limited by, predefined and static parameters, which limit their adaptability to the user. This article presents a modular framework that uses natural language processing (NLP) technologies to extract significant features from student-written contributions to build dynamic profiles that model their abilities and needs. These generated profiles are then used to guide Large Language Models (LLMs) in producing learning content that can be deemed adaptive and personalized. The proposed system integrates and aims to offer a real benefit to both students and teachers. The article will focus on the description of the designed pipeline, its applications in different educational contexts, the evaluation methodology, and, finally, the resulting ethical safeguards.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., ... & McGrew, B. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv:2303.08774. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
Anil, R., Dai, A. M., Firat, O., Johnson, M., Lepikhin, D., Passos, A., ... & Wu, Y. (2023). PaLM 2 technical report. arXiv:2305.10403. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10403
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods ap-proaches. SAGE.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recom-mendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Fung, B. C., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010). Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent de-velopments. ACM Computing Surveys, 42(4), 1–53.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé III, H., Dudik, M., & Wallach, H. (2019). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300830
Honnibal, M., Montani, I., Van Landeghem, S., & Boyd, A. (2020). spaCy: Industrial-strength natural language processing in Python.
Hu, S., & Wang, X. (2024, August). FOKE: A personalized and explainable education framework integrating foundation models, knowledge graphs, and prompt engineering. In China National Conference on Big Data and Social Computing (pp. 399–411). Springer.
Hunter, J. S. (1986). The exponentially weighted moving average. Journal of Quality Technology, 18(4), 203–210.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Betschart, M., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (RBR-75-8).
Lan, Y., Li, X., Du, H., Lu, X., Gao, M., Qian, W., & Zhou, A. (2024). Survey of natural language processing for education: Taxonomy, systematic review, and future trends. arXiv:2401.07518.
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62.
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education.
Maity, S., & Deroy, A. (2024). Generative AI and its impact on personalized intelligent tutoring systems. arXiv:2410.10650.
Mohajan, H. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence: Prospects and challenges in future progression. Art and Society, 4(7), 38–50.
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word–emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x
Neamatullah, I., Douglass, M. M., Lehman, L. W. H., Reisner, A., Villarroel, M., Long, W. J., ... & Clifford, G. D. (2008). Automated de-identification of free-text medical records. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 8(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-32
Rau, M. A., & Zahn, M. (2022). Nonverbal collaboration on perceptual learning activities with chemistry visual-izations. In M. M. Rodrigo et al. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (Vol. 13356). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_41
Rodríguez-Ortiz, M. Á., Santana-Mancilla, P. C., & Anido-Rifón, L. E. (2025). Machine learning and generative AI in learning analytics for higher education: A systematic review of models, trends, and challenges. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8679. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158679
Sharma, S., Mittal, P., Kumar, M., & Bhardwaj, V. (2025). The role of large language models in personalized learning: A systematic review of educational impact. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 1–24.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Vajjala, S., & Rama, T. (2018). Experiments with universal CEFR classification. arXiv:1804.06636.
Wang, X. J., Lee, C. P., & Mutlu, B. (2025, April). LearnMate: Enhancing online education with LLM-powered personalized learning plans and support. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–10).
Winne, P. H. (2017). Learning analytics for self-regulated learning. In Handbook of Learning Analytics (pp. 241–249). Society for Learning Analytics Research. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.020
Wu, F., Dang, Y., & Li, M. (2025). A systematic review of responses, attitudes, and utilization behaviors on gen-erative AI for teaching and learning in higher education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 467.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educa-tional Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Modestino Matarazzo, Roberto Caldelli, Barbara Martini , Filippo Sciarrone
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
