Generative Artificial Intelligence and Videogame Analysis for Game-Based Learning: A Comparison between Automated Assessment and Expert Evaluation

Autori

  • Francesco Claudio Ugolini Università degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi
  • Francesca Fallucchi Università degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi
  • Michele Sardo Università degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi
  • Domenico Morreale Università degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi

Parole chiave:

Game-based learning, generative AI, videogames

Abstract

This study focuses specifically on Game-Based Learning (GBL), with the aim of examining how generative AI can assist teachers in designing educational activities that incorporate the pedagogical use of videogames not originally intended for educational purposes. Within a more general model which includes a game analysis from a pedagogical point of view and, subsequently, the design of learning activities, in this paper we compare the results of a human-based analysis whit an AI-based one, both referring to a specific framework involving three main dimensions: directivity, sociality and modifiability. We chose 8 games varying by notoriety, type and recency; we analyzed them according to our framework and then made them analyze by generative AI, trained with the same framework, and then compared them one with each other. We found that in most renowned games, the AI adopts a more technical or slang language. AI-generated answers also tend to go beyond the focus led by the prompt giving suggestion about instructional design. The study also helped to refine our theoretical framework by comparing its human interpretation with another one, AI-generated, namely about the dimension of modifiability.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Andreoletti, M. & Tinterri, A. (2023). Apprendere con i giochi. Esperienze di progettazione ludica. Carocci.

Ugolini, F.C. & Morreale, D. (2023). Ambienti videoludici per l’apprendimento: un framework per la progetta-zione di attività didattiche. I problemi della pedagogia. a. LXIX (2), 359-386.

Clark, R. (2000). Four Architectures of Instruction. Performance Improvement. 39 (10), 31-38.

Calvani, A. (2011). Principi dell’istruzione e strategie per insegnare. Criteri per una didattica efficace. Carocci.

Papert, S. (1993). The Children’s Machine. Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. Basic Books.

Benassi, A. (Ed.) (2021). A scuola con Minecraft. Progettare un mondo a cubetti. Giunti Scuola.

Jensen, J.F. (1998). Interactivity: Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies. NORDICOM Review, 19 (1).

Jensen, J.F. (2008). The Concept of Interactivity – Revisited: Four New Typologies for a New Media Landscape’. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video UXTV ’08, ACM.

Hanghøj, T. (2013). Game-based teaching: Practices, roles, and pedagogies. In New Pedagogical Approaches in Game-enhanced Learning: Curriculum integration (pp. 81-101). IGI Global.

Sardo, M., Morreale, D., & Ugolini, F. C. (2024). Directivity and Modifiability in video-game environments for learning. Two paradigmatic cases compared. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 4(3). https://www.inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/236

Sardo, M., & Thibault, M. (2024). An educational leap of faith: Exploring the connections between instructional architectures and digital game spaces. In P. DSouza, M. Buji, N. Xi, & J. Hamari (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International GamiFIN Conference (pp. 68-78). (Ceur Workshop proceedings; Vol. 3669). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3669/paper7.pdf

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2025-11-21

Come citare

Ugolini, F. C., Fallucchi, F. ., Sardo, M. ., & Morreale, D. . (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Videogame Analysis for Game-Based Learning: A Comparison between Automated Assessment and Expert Evaluation. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 5(4). Recuperato da https://inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/450