Participatory Approaches in the Digital Era: Cellphilming

A New Way to Engage Adolescents and Young Adults.

Autori

  • Paola Dusi Università degli Studi di Verona
  • Francesco Vittori Università degli studi di Verona

Parole chiave:

adolescence; participatory visual methodology; cellphilming; educational practices; social pedagogy and activism.

Abstract

The ubiquitous and often toxic presence of ICTs in contemporary life has sparked critical debates regarding their impact on society, particularly for adolescents and young adults. This paper explores how Participatory Visual Methodology (PVM) leverages the audiovisual capabilities of smartphones to challenge dominant perceptions of technology, transforming it into a tool for empowerment and critical thinking in the digital era. The paper delves into the theoretical foundations of PVM and examines its practical implications for social pedagogy and educational activism, focusing on a recent methodology: cellphilming. Then follows a short presentation of a workshop conducted by the authors with future education professionals (L-19), centered on educational practices for adolescents within the framework of visual literacy, aimed at promoting a critical and community-oriented use of mobile devices. The findings underscore the transformative potential of integrating cellphilming into educational practices designed for adolescents, fostering their media literacy and promoting their onlife agency. This study contributes to the growing body of research advocating for the conscious and critical use of ICTs, particularly among teenagers, and its application as a catalyst for social change.

Biografie autore

Paola Dusi, Università degli Studi di Verona

Paola Dusi è professoressa ordinaria di Pedagogia Generale e Sociale, dove insegna Adolescenza e Educazione, e Pedagogia Interculturale. Coordina il Centro di ricerca Identity & Inclusion presso il Dipartimento di Scienze Umane degli studi di Verona. Si occupa di relazioni educative familiari, di adolescenza e di educazione interculturale decoloniale. Formata all’approccio educativo sistemico, individua nella fenomenologia del riconoscimento la modalità relazionale alla base dei processi educativi. È autrice di numerose pubblicazioni in riviste nazionali e internazionali. Ricordiamo: Il Riconoscimento. Alle origini dell’aver cura educativo (2017), Franco Angeli; At the core of intercultural education: Recognition (2020), in C. Pica-Smith, C. N. Veloria, R.M. Contini (Eds.), Intercultural Education: Critical Perspectives, Pedagogical Challenges, and Promising Practices, Nova Publisher; Intrecciando linguaggi, tessendo cammini. Il plurilinguismo per la scuola inclusiva (2022), (con M. Majorano e P. Nitti) Junior; Il mestiere di Pedagogista (a cura di) (2023), (con A. De Vita), ETS; Riconoscimento, in D. Simeone (Ed.), Dizionario di Pedagogia generale e sociale, Scholè; Imparare ad abitare zone scomode: decolonizzare la conoscenza e i sistemi scolastici andando oltre il deficit thinking, (2024) Pedagogia & Vita.

Francesco Vittori, Università degli studi di Verona

Francesco Vittori è assegnista di ricerca presso il Dipartimento di Scienze Umane in Pedagogia generale e sociale (M-PED/01). Il suo lavoro di ricerca attraversa e intreccia la pedagogia critica e sociale, gli studi di genere e intersezionali, la formazione alla cittadinanza ecologica, le pratiche di consumo-produzione sostenibili, l’agroecologia come paradigma trasformativo e la digital education. I suoi più recenti contributi sono stati pubblicati da riviste nazionali e internazionali quali Environmental Innovation and Societal Transition (2024), Scuola Democratica (2024), Formazione & Insegnamento (2023), Cultura pedagogica e scenari educativi (2023), Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (2023), Journal of Rural Studies (2023) e MeTis – Mondi educativi. Temi, indagini, suggestioni (2022)

Riferimenti bibliografici

Anzaldúa, G. (2002). Preface (Un)natural bridges, (Un)safe spaces. In G. Anzaldúa & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 1-5). New York, NY: Routledge.

Barley, R., & Russell, L. (2019). Participatory visual methods: exploring young people’s identities, hopes and feelings. Ethnography and education, 14(2), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2018.1441041

Baron, N. S. (2008). Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barone, P. (2019). Gli anni stretti. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Bruns, A. (2009). From prosumer to produser: Understanding user-led content creation. Paper presented at the Transforming Audiences Conference 2009, London. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/27370/

de Castro Pitano, S. (2017). A educação problematizadora de Paulo Freire, uma pedagogia do sujeito social. Revista Inter-Ação, 42(1), 087-104. https://doi.org/10.5216/ia.v42i1.43774

Caronia, L., & Caron, A. H. (2010). Crescere senza fili. I nuovi riti dell’interazione sociale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Das, R. (2024). Generative AI: Phishing and Cybersecurity Metrics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Dockney, J., Tomaselli, K. G., & Hart, T. B. (2010). Cellphilms, mobile platforms, and prodsumers Hyper-individuality and film. In N. Hyde-Clark (Ed.), The citizen in communication: Re-visiting traditional, new and community media practices in South Africa (pp. 91-116). Kenwin: Juta.

Dougherty, A. (2011). Live-streaming mobile video: Production as civic engagement. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, 425-434. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037437

Gilbert, M. N. (2020). An uptrend among students: Nomophobia. Journal of Applied Science and Research, 8(2), 25-59.

Floridi, L. (Ed.) (2015). The onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. New York, NY: Springer.

Fossum, I. N., Nordnes, L. T., Storemark, S. S., Bjorvatn, B., & Pallesen, S. (2014). The association between use of electronic media in bed before going to sleep and insomnia symptoms, daytime sleepiness, morningness, and chronotype. Behavioral sleep medicine, 12(5), 343-357. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15402002.2013.819468

Gilligan, C. (1990). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Goggin, G. (ed.). (2013). Mobile phone cultures. Oxon: Routledge.

Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. London: Calder and Boyars.

ITU (2023). Facts and Figures 2023. Measuring digital development. ITU Publications. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2023/

Ito, M. (2004). Personal Portable Pedestrian: Lessons from Japanese Mobile Phone Use. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 3(5), 1-7.

Lepp, A., Li, J., Barkley, J. E., & Salehi-Esfahani, S. (2015). Exploring the relationships between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.006

Lieberman, A. E. (2003). Taking ownership: Strengthening indigenous cultures and languages through the use of ICTs. Washington, D.C.: LearnLink.

MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (2016). What’s a cellphilm? An introduction. In K. MacEntee, C. Burkholder, & J. Schwab-Cartas (Eds.), What’s a cellphilm? Integrating mobile technology into visual research and activism (pp. 1-15). Boston: Sense Publishers.

MacEntee, K., & Mandrona, A. (2015). From discomfort to collaboration: Teachers screening cellphilms in a rural South African school. Perspectives in Education, 33(4), 42-56.

https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC185871

Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The Effect of Mobile Phone Screen Size on Video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51-61.

Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2013). What can a teacher do with a cellphone? Using participatory visual research to speak back in addressing HIV&AIDS. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1-13. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC144584

Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., & Moletsane, R. (2016). Me and my cellphone: Constructing change from the inside through cellphilms and participatory video in a rural community. Area, 48(4), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12142

Mitchell, C., Moletsane, R., & De Lange, N. (2017). Participatory visual methodologies: Social change, community and policy. London: SAGE.

Mitchell, C. M., & Sommer, M. (2016). Participatory visual methodologies in global public health. Global public health, 11(5-6), 521-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1170184

Mitchell, W. J. T. (1995). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Morgan, L. (2024). GenAI’s Impact on Cybersecurity. InformationWeek, November 7. Retrieved from https://www.informationweek.com/it-leadership/genai-s-impact-on-cybersecurity

Peters, M. A. (2007). Foucault, biopolitics and the birth of neoliberalism. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480701494218

Safaria, T., Probowati Rahayu, Y., & Rahaju, S. (2024). “Oh my phone, I can’t live without you”: a phenomenological study of nomophobia among college students. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-06-2023-0092

Schratz, M., & Walker, R. (1995). Research as social change: New possibilities for qualitative research. London: Routledge.

Toh, S. H., Howie, E. K., Coenen, P., & Straker, L. M. (2019). “From the moment I wake up I will use it… every day, very hour”: a qualitative study on the patterns of adolescents’ mobile touch screen device use from adolescent and parent perspectives. BMC pediatrics, 19, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1399-5

Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, sui-cide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among US adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical psychological science, 6(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617723376

Vaillancourt, T., Faris, R., & Mishna, F. (2017). Cyberbullying in children and youth: implications for health and clinical practice. The Canadian journal of psychiatry, 62(6), 368-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716684791

Yang, K. H. (2015). Voice, Authenticity and Ethical Challenges: The Participatory Dissemination of Youth-Generated Data Over Social Media. Visual Studies, 30(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2015.1017364

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2025-02-28 — Aggiornato il 2025-03-03

Versioni

Come citare

Dusi, P., & Vittori, F. (2025). Participatory Approaches in the Digital Era: Cellphilming: A New Way to Engage Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 4(4). Recuperato da https://inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/247 (Original work published 28 febbraio 2025)