PNRR and School: new research paths to support digitisation processes in public administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32043/jimtlt.v4i1.147Parole chiave:
PNRR; Educational Research; Embodied CognitionAbstract
La complessità della scuola e della sua gestione organizzativa e didattica è risultata in questi ultimi anni sempre più evidente. Le variabili che entrano continuamente in gioco, grazie a repentine richieste normative di trasformazione, nonché a mode didattiche ed educative, condizionano scelte, decisioni e stati d’animo. Parallelamente il fenomeno Onlife [1] che riconosce sempre più la nostra vita invischiata con la tecnologia, ci invita a inquadrare la scuola secondo vision e mission innovative, consapevoli che il mondo digitale non può e non deve sostituire quello reale, piuttosto sostenerlo, evitando di negarne la valenza unica ed emotivamente espressa che la fisicità gli offre. Questo quadro nell’ambito dell’educazione, non solo si riflette e apre nuove traiettorie di studio e ricerca, ma giunge in concomitanza ai finanziamenti del PNRR. A fronte di questo tsunami finanziario, ci chiediamo quanto sono realmente conosciuti e utilizzati gli approcci innovativi, a cominciare dall’Embodied Cognition, necessari a tale trasformazione, quanto siano innestati i progetti PNRR sui costrutti che li sottendono, come e perché impatteranno queste iniziative promosse dalle scuole (sollecitate in modo mirato dal MIM), quanto verrà capitalizzato - come patrimonio di competenze – e se, e come, queste ultime verranno implementate.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Arduini G. (2012). Augmented reality and new educational perspectives. Education Sciences & Society, 3(2), 209-216.
Asquini, G. (2018) (ed.). Research-Training. Themes, experiences, perspectives. Milan: FrancoAngeli
Bell, M. (2020). The Emerging Consensus, The Learning Scientist. https://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2019/5/30-1?rq=bell
Benes, R., Cellie, D., Domenis, L. C., & Kopciowski, J. (2017). For a pedagogy of error.
Bryk, A. S. (2015). Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9): 467-477.
Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2010). Digital competence in schools. Models, tools, research. Italian Journal of Educational Research, (5), 9-21.
Calvani, A., & Trinchero R. (2019). Ten false myths and ten rules for teaching well. Rome: Carocci.
Calvani, A., & Marzano, A. (2020). Designing for evidence-based improvement. Which methodology?. Italian Journal of Educational Research, (24), 67-83.
Cannella, M., & Gay, F. (2018). Augmented environments and media archaeology. In Digital environments for art and heritage education (pp. 64-78). Franco Angeli.
Caruana, AM. Borghi, Embodied cognition: A new psychology. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia. 2013;40(1):23-48. DOI: 10.1421/73973
Cawood S. (2007). Augmented reality. A practical guide. Raleigh, N.C.: Pragmatic Bookshelf.
Colombo, M. (2011). School reforms and European learning policies. Capacity, activation, citizenship competences. Teaching professionalism and learning processes, 14, 16-29.
Damasio, A. R., & Macaluso, F. (2004). Descartes' error: emotion, reason and the human brain. Adelphi.
Damiani, E. (2006). The New Alliance. Themes, problems and perspectives of the New Educational Research. Brescia: La Scuola.
Damiani, P. Inclusion and epigenetic perspective. In: La Sperimentazione Della "Scuola ECS Based", Formazione & Insegnamento XVIII - 1. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia; 2020
Damiani, P., Minghelli, V., D'Anna, C., & Paloma, F. G. (2021). The Embodied Cognition based approach in teacher education. A recursive training model for integrated teacher competences. Online Annals of Teacher Education and Training, 13(21), 106-128.
Davies, P. (1999), What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2): 108-121.
Eggers W. D. (2016), Delivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technologies That Are Transforming Government. New York, Deloitte University Press and Rosetta Books.
Ferri, P. (2021). How schools will change with the PNRR: Measures to close gaps and align with the EU. EU DIGITAL AGENDA, 1-5.
Floridi, L. (2016). Welcome to the age of onlife. Treccani Atlas. en.
Floridi, L. (2021). Digital time: latency, real time and the onlife experience of everyday time. Philosophy and Technology , 34 (3), 407-412.
Gallese, V. Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2005b;4:23-48 [25]
Gamelli, I (2012), What body are we talking about? In: The Embedded Knowledge in Education and Care. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Guglielman E. (2011). Towards inclusive "e-learning". Initial contributions to the construction of guidelines for methodological-didactic accessibility. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 2(4), 167-186.
Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: modality, variety, affordance. The SAGE handbook of online research methods , 257-270.
Jenkins H., Purushotma R., Weigel M., Clinton K., Robinson A., (2010), Participatory cultures and digital competencies: media education for the 21st century, Guerini, Milan.
Istat (2019), Education levels and employment returns, available at https://www.istat.it/it/files/2020/07/Livelli-di-istruzione-e-ritorni-occupazionali.pdf.
Laneve G., Waiting for the return to schools: reflections (in no particular order) on schooling between a sense of place and the prospects of technology, "Osservatorio costituzionale", 3, p.411
Lewin, K. (1946) Action research and minority problems, in G.W. Lewin (Ed.) Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper & Row (1948)
Lewis, C. (2015). What Is Improvement Science? Do We Need It in Education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54-61, DOI: 10.3102/0013 189X -15570388.
Livingstone, S. (2013). V ZER: Journal of communication studies , 18 (35), 13-28.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). V
Magnoler, P. (2012). Research and training. The professionalisation of teachers. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
Manovich, L. Cultural Analytics. The computational analysis of culture, transl. it. Milan, Cortina, 2023 (ed. orig. 2020).
Manovich, L. Cultural Analytics. The computational analysis of culture, transl. it. Milan, Cortina, 2023 (ed.
orig. 2020).
McCarthy J. (2020), What is artificial intelligence? Stanford University - Computer Science Department, Stanford 2007, in http://www-for- mal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf (12-12-2020).
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology
Research and Development, 50(3): 43-59.
Merrill, M. D. (2006a). First principles of instruction: A synthesis. In R. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 2-71). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
studies year XIII | number 24 | June 2020 81 Merrill, M. D. (2006b). Levels of instructional strategy. Education Technology, 46(4): 5-10.
Miur (2019), Early school leaving in the 2016/2017 school year and in the transition to the 2017/2018 school year, available at urly.co.uk/3cwjc.
OECD (2018), Italy. Country Note: PISA results, https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_ITA_IT.pdf.
Panciroli, C., Corazza, L., Vignola, P., Marcato, E., & Leone, D. (2018). Innovative teaching methods. Effective solutions to complex contests= Innovative teaching methods. Effective solutions to complex contests. Form@ re, 18(2), 116-129.
Pellerey M. (2005). Towards a new educational research methodology: Design-Based-Research.
Pnrr Education available at :https://pnrr.istruzione.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/PNRR.pdf
Ranieri, M., Gaggioli, C., & Borges, MK (2020). Didactics to the test of Covid-19 in Italy: a study on Primary School. Prassi educativa , 15 .
Redecker C., (2017). European framework for educators' digital competence: DigCompEdu.
Rivoltella P.C., Il Vitello d'oro della comunicazione: pensare o piacere, in "Scuola di teologia per Laici", Monza, 25 October 2016, p. 3.
Rivoltella (2023) L'analisi pedagogica e i suoi oggetti al tempo dell'Intelligenza Artificiale, in Studi sulla formazione, 26, 63-67, 2023-2.
Rossi P. G., Gli artefatti digitali e i processi di mediazione didattica, in "Pedagogia Oggi", Siped, 25 September 2016, p.1 ff.
Siemens, G., Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. In internet, Url: elearnspace.org/.../connectivism
Vannini, I. (2018). Introduction. Doing educational research to promote teaching professionalism. The 'here and now' of the CRESPI Centre In G. Asquini, Research-Training. Themes, experiences, perspectives (pp.13-24). Milan: FrancoAngeli.
Volli U., (2018) Il nuovo libro della comunicazione. Che cosa significa comunicare: idee, tecnologie, strumenti, modelli, Il Saggiatore, Milano, 2014, p. 235
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., Punie, Y., & Dahl, M. R. (2022). DigComp 2.2: Den Digitale Kompetenceramme for Borgerne.
Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Evidence-based education. Statement of G. J. Whitehurst during the Student Achievement and School Accountability Conference, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
Wolf, M. (2009). V. Vita e Pensiero.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 Professore, Dottoressa, antonio cuccaro
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.