The didactic-pedagogical link between Artificial Intelligence, embodiment and developing engagement in secondary schools
Parole chiave:
engagement; intelligenza artificiale; embodimentAbstract
Student engagement is one of the most important factors influencing effective learning in secondary schools. This paper explores the combined potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and embodiment to improve student engagement. Specifically, an experimental study was conducted using the Nao robot to teach digital and logical skills, combined with motor activities to promote embodiment in motor science classroom activities. Data was collected using the Student Engagement Scale (SES) and qualitative analysis of student responses. The results show that both approaches significantly increase engagement, but in different ways: AI promotes emotional and cognitive engagement, whereas embodiment promotes behavioural engagement. These findings suggest that a combination of AI and embodiment could be an innovative strategy to promote more dynamic and engaging learning.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Ava, M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Student Engagement: New Frontiers in Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 22-35.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Bianchi, E., & Dautenhahn, K. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Interna-tional Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 493–511.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Gallese, V. (2011). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. In Embodied Cognition and the Arts (pp. 145–161). Routledge.
Dautenhahn, K., & Billard, A. (2002). Towards social robots for the elderly. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 43(2–3), 143–148.
Klein, J. T. (2014). Beyond interdisciplinary: A new agenda for higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 46(4), 36–43.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Baker, R. S. J. D., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning, Design, and Technology (pp. 1–24). Springer.
Lund, A., & Lindqvist, U. (2019). The role of robot-assisted therapy in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: A review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(10), 4190–4201.
Feng, Y., & Jansen, D. (2018). Robots in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(4), 517–534.
Miller, T., & Sweeney, K. (2017). The role of physical activity in promoting academic achievement in youth: A systematic review. American Journal of Health Promotion, 31(6), 448–456.
Santos, A. F., & Mota, M. A. (2016). The impact of embodied learning on engagement in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 152–164.
Cobo, C., & Moravec, J. W. (2011). The future of learning: A shift from education to learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 6(3), 4–10.
Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (2001). Physical education futures. Routledge.
Chiu, T. K. F., & Chang, Y. J. (2019). Embodied learning and its impact on student engagement in physical edu-cation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(5), 450–464.
Gonzalez, C., & Watanabe, T. (2020). Learning by doing: The impact of embodied learning activities on cognitive and motor skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 540–553.
Rossi, L., & De Luca, A. (2023). Embodied Learning in Physical Education: The Role of Body in Enhancing Engagement and Cognitive Skills. International Journal of Physical Education and Pedagogy, 30(2), 100-115.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Gianluca Gravino, Lucia Ariemma, Francesco Tafuri
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
