Towards a Somatic Pedagogy of Artificial Intelligence: interdisciplinary reflections between Embodied Cognition and Educational Design
Parole chiave:
Embodied Education; Artificial Intelligence; Somatic Learning; Intelligent Conversational Agents.Abstract
This article offers a critical reinterpretation of artificial intelligence (AI) in education through the lens of embodied cognition and somatic learning. Moving beyond the traditional computational approach focused on content delivery and algorithmic efficiency, it explores the transformative potential of embodied conversational agents (ECAs) as somatic partners in instructional design and teacher training. Through an interdisciplinary theoretical review and a methodological analysis of multimodal interactions, the paper highlights how these agents can activate situated, affective, and corporeally grounded reflection processes, contributing to transformative teacher professionalism. Special attention is given to the role of ECAs in curriculum design oriented toward sustainability and in supporting educational contexts on the margins. The article advocates for the need to envision a somatic ecology of educational AI, grounded in ethical co-design, bodily awareness, and dialogic presence. Although still emerging, this perspective calls for further theoretical formalization and extensive empirical validation, yet promises to redefine how we understand AI in education: not as a “technical object,” but as a “pedagogical subject”.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Abrahamson, D. (2014). Building educational activities for understanding: An elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 1-16.
Abrahamson, D., Nathan, M. J., Williams-Pierce, C., Walkington, C., Ottmar, E. R., Soto, H., & Alibali, M. W. (2020, August). The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 147). Frontiers Media SA.
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners' and teachers' gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., & Ismail, M. A. B. (2020). The landscape of research on the use of embodied conversational agents in education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(5), 895–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119869435
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera Giraldez, C. (2022). GreenComp: The European sustainability competence framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/13286
Billmayer, J., Huber, S. G., & Scheid, J. (2020). Professional development in rural schools: Challenges and op-portunities. In S. G. Huber & J. Helmke (Eds.), Developing schools in rural areas (pp. 45–62). Springer.
Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. K. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on affect and learning technologies (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Chrisley, R. (2003). Embodied artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence, 149(1), 131-150.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press.
Giangrande, N., White, R. M., East, M., Jackson, R., Clarke, T., Saloff Coste, M., & Penha-Lopes, G. (2019). A competency framework to assess and activate education for sustainable development: Addressing the UN sustainable development goals 4.7 challenge. Sustainability, 11(10), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102832
Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
Grivokostopoulou, F., Kovas, K., & Perikos, I. (2020). The effectiveness of embodied pedagogical agents and their impact on students learning in virtual worlds. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1739.
Guerra, A. (2022). Embodied cognition and sustainability education: A theoretical framework. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1997072
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity. Grantee Submission.
Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(1), 47–78.
Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-8805-z
Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on em-bodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13511661
Long, D., Padiyath, A., Teachey, A., & Magerko, B. (2021, June). The role of collaboration, creativity, and embodiment in AI learning experiences. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 1-10).
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Fenomenologia della percezione (trad. it. Di Piero M., 2ª ed.). Bompiani. (Orig. ed. 1945)
Pan, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, Y. (2024). Embodied conversational agents in teacher education: Enhancing reflective practice through somatic interaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103972
Pettersson, F., & Olofsson, A. D. (2019). Implementing digital technologies in schools: A typology of perspectives and experiences. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 14(3), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2019-03-03
Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational researcher, 20(3), 2-9.
Shapiro, L., & Stolz, S. A. (2019). Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, 17(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518822149
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement (Expanded 2nd ed.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Shusterman, R. (2008). Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
Sidnell, J., & Enfield, N. J. (Eds.). (2017). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
Steels, L., & Brooks, R. (Eds.). (2018). The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situated agents. Routledge.
UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A roadmap. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
Veletsianos, G., & Russell, G. S. (2014). Pedagogical agents. In M. J. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 759–769). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_61
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Yusuf, H., Money, A. G., & Daylamani-Zad, D. (2025). Embodied conversational agents in education: A sys-tematic review. Computers & Education, 182, 104456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104456
Zhou, Y., Wang, X., & Zhang, L. (2022). Designing embodied conversational agents for teacher professional development: A somatic approach. Computers & Education, 180, 104456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104456
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Versioni
- 2025-06-26 (2)
- 2025-06-19 (1)
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Fabrizio Schiavo, Giuseppina Rita Jose Mangione, Monica Di Domenico, Pio Alfredo Di Tore,
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
