The impact of Artificial intelligence in democratic education: Decidim, flipped inclusion and the challenges of inclusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32043/jimtlt.v4i1.151Parole chiave:
Artificial intelligence; Democratic education; InclusionAbstract
A State can declare itself democratic, if it substantiates its being a guarantor of universal rights, in terms of pro-active co-participation and informed decisions (Davies, Harber, & Schweisfurth, 2002). Training individuals and communities to develop a culture of rights and responsibilities (Vorhaus, 2005) based on co-responsible policy models requires ethical education in interconnection, active citizenship, equal access to participatory instrumentalities (Davies, Harber , & Schweisfurth, 2002). How could the use of artificial intelligence revolutionize informed democratic participation? Decidim (Aragón et al., 2017), a platform created by the Barcelona municipal government in 2016, uses AI to filter and analyze citizen information, promoting transparency and inclusion. This technology enables more accessible and inclusive engagement by integrating community voices into the political decision-making sphere (Severino 2022) and represents an excellent example of how AI can be leveraged to foster more informed and inclusive democratic participation. In this direction, democratic education requires perspectives of systemic inclusiveness: the Flipped Inclusion model (Corona & De Giuseppe, 2015), promoting democratic values for an inclusive-prosocial community, invests in training for conscious self-determination (De Giuseppe, 2020 ). The challenge is to experiment with the application of the Decidim platform using the simple structural architecture of the Flipped Inclusion model.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Accoto, C. (2017). Il mondo dato. Cinque brevi lezioni di filosofia digitale. Milano: Egea.
Accoto, C. (2019). Il mondo ex machina. Cinque brevi lezioni di filosofia dell'automazione. Milano: Egea
Aragón, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Calleja-López, A., Pereira, A., Monterde, A., Barandiaran, X. E., Gómez, V. (2017). Deliberative Platform Design: The case study of online discussions in Decidim Barcelona, Social Informatics 9th International Conference, SocInfo, Oxford, UK, September 13- 15, Proceed-ings, Part II. Cornell University.
Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/education-rebooted/ (ver. 15.12.2020).
Bauman Z. (2003), Modernità liquida, Roma-Bari, Laterza.
Beetham, D., & Boyle, K. (1995). Introducing democracy: 80 questions and answers. Polity Press.
Beetham, D., & Boyle, K. (1995). Introducing democracy: 80 questions and answers. Po¬lity Press.
Benanti, P., Maffettone, S. (2021). "Sustainability D." The consequences of the digital revolution in our lives. Il Mulino – 2.
Berkeley G. (1998), A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Oxford, Oxford University Press Academic.
Bronfenbrenner U. (2002), Ecologia dello sviluppo umano, Bologna, il Mulino.
Buckingham, D. (2009). The future of media literacy in the digital age: some challenges for policy and practice. Medienimpulse,47(2). https://doi.org/10.21243/mi-02-09-13 (ver. 15.12.2020).
Cambi F, 2014, Le pedagogie del Novecento, Edizioni Laterza.
Comunicazione della Commissione COM (2019)168 al Parlamento europeo, al Consiglio, al Comitato eco-nomico e sociale europeo e al comitato delle regioni, 8 aprile 2019. Creare fiducia nell'intelligenza artificiale antropocentrica.
Corona F. e De Giuseppe T. (2016), Mutismo tra elettività e selettività in un eziologico processo di ricono-scimento inclusivo, “Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion”, vol. 4, n. 1.
Corona F. e De Giuseppe T. (2017) La flipped inclusion, tra impianto teoretico e didattica sperimentale di aula aumentata per una didattica inclusiva, in Pedagogia più didattica , Vol III , Trento: Erickson.
Davies, L., Harber, C., & Schweisfurth, M. (2002). Democracy through teacher education. CIER/CfBT.
De Giuseppe T. (2016), Mutismo selettivo e flipped inclusion, tra prospettive ecologico-sistemiche e model-lizzanti capovolgimenti inclusivi, “Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion”, vol. 4, n. 1.
De Giuseppe T., Ciambrone R., Corona, F. (2018). La sperimentazione inclusiva di approcci sistemici nella didattica capovolta, in FORMAZIONE E INSEGNAMENTO. vol. XVI - 1. Pag.189-204.
De Giuseppe Tonia, Corona Felice, (2020) Tendenze tecnologiche emergenti e dirompenti nell'istruzione e nel mondo del lavoro Pag.52-89 Pennsylvania (USA) IGI GLOBAL.
De Giuseppe, T. (2016), Metodologia Flipped tra sistemica inclusione e prospettive didattico-
De Giuseppe, T. (2020). Flipped Inclusion Computational Thinking and transformative phenomenologies in the Society of Knowledge. Avellino: Il Papavero.
Dewey J, 2018, Democrazia e educazione, a cura di Spadafora G.
Di Tore A. P. (2023), Metawelt. Corpi, interazioni, educazioni, Studium: La cultura.
Di Tore, P.A. (2023) , Intelligenza Artificiale e processi educativi secondo l’Intelligenza Artificiale, ed. Anicia,QTimes – webmagazine
Di Tore, S. et al (2017) Utilizzo della tecnologia dei display montati sulla testa per supportare l’insegnamento attraverso ambienti di apprendimento virtuale in contesti non formali, Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, ed. Pensa Multimedia.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy. Toward Consolidation. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Educause. (2019). Horizon report: 2019 higher education edition. EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf (ver. 15.12.2020).
Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M.-P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010051 (ver. 15.12.2020).
Hoskins, B. (2006). Draft framework on indicators for Active Citizenship. CRELL.
https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449 (ver. 15.12.2020).
Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T., Churchward, A., & Krause, K. (2008). First Year Studen¬ts’ Experiences with Technology: Are they really Digital Natives? Australa¬sian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed - an argument for AI in education. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1475756/ (ver. 15.12.2020).
McKeachie W.J. (2002), Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (9th ed.), Lexington, MA, D.C. Heath and Co., p. 144.
Mounier E. (1999), Il personalismo, Roma, AVE.
Mura, A. (2020).Inclusione e collaborazione a scuola: un’occasione per insegnanti e famiglia, SSN 2282–6041 (on line) | DOI: 10.7346/sipes-01-2020-19 Pensa Multimedia.
Nuzzaci, (2021) Educazione democratica.
Nuzzaci, A. (Ed.) (2011). Patrimoni culturali, educazioni, territori: verso un’idea di multili¬teracy. Pensa MultiMedia Editore s.r.l.
OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). Recommendation of the Council on OECD Legal Instruments Artificial Intelligence. OECD/LEGAL/0449.
Panciroli, C. (2018). Educare nella città. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Panciroli, C. et al (2020), Intelligenza artificiale e educazione: nuove prospettive di ricerca, Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, ISSN 1825-7321, vol. 20, n. 3, pp. 1-12.
Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Paris: Unesco.
Prinsloo, P. (2017). Fleeing from Frankenstein’s monster and meeting Kafka on the way: Algorithmic deci-sion-making in higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media. 14(3), 138–163.
Rivoltella, P. C. (2020). La didattica al tempo della mediatizzazione. Tra retrotopia e innovazione, 3° Con-vegno EDUIA, Università Roma Tre, 6 novembre 2020.
Severino, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence. Politics, economics, law, technology. Rome: Luiss University Press.
Sibilio M. (2014) La didattica semplessa, Napoli, Liguori.
UNESCO (1978). Towards a methodology for projecting rates of literacy and educational attainment. UNESCO (Current Surveys and Research in Statistics, No. 28).
UNESCO (1979). Records of the General Conference Twentieth Session (Vol. 1 - Paris, 24 October to 28 November 1978). United Nations.
Vorhaus, J. (2005). Citizenship, competence and profound disability. Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 461-475.
Vygotskij L.S. (1990), Storia dello sviluppo delle funzioni psichiche superiori. E altri scritti, Firenze, Giun-ti-Barbèra, ed. or. 1930-31.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Schalock, R. (2001). Self-determination and quality of life: Implications for special education services and supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(8), 1-16.
Wood, W. M., Karvonen, M., Test, D. W., Browder, D., & Algozzine, B. (2004). Promoting student self-determination skills in IEP planning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 8-16.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on ar-tificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 (ver. 15.12.2020).
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 Tonia De Giuseppe
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
