Adopting technology in special education: a question of values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32043/jimtlt.v3i1.62Parole chiave:
Values; motivation; inclusion; technologies.Abstract
Inclusion is configured as an action aimed at the realization of inclusive values which are guides and an impetus for the action itself. Many studies have shown that intrinsic motivation plays an important role in the adoption of technology in teaching and is essential for action aimed at valuing differences. Based on these considerations, the aim of the contribution is to trace the theoretical framework of a research project aimed at investigating the role of values and motivation of future support teachers in adopting technologies in teaching.
L'inclusione si configura come un'azione rivolta alla realizzazione di valori inclusivi che sono guide e un impulso per l'azione stessa. Molti studi hanno evidenziato che la motivazione intrinseca ha un ruolo importante nell'adozione della tecnologia in didattica ed è fondamentale per un agire teso alla valorizzazione delle differenze. Sulla base di tali considerazioni, l'obiettivo del contributo è quello di tracciare la cornice teorica di un progetto di ricerca volto ad indagare il ruolo dei valori e della motivazione dei futuri docenti di sostegno ad adottare le tecnologie in didattica.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Aiello, P., & Pace, E. M. (2020). Inclusive educational principles, policies, and practices in Italy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), 261.
Amabile T. M., & Pratt M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36: 157-183. Doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological review, 64(6p1), 359.
Bagozzi R.P., Davis F.D., & Warshaw P.R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relation, 45(7), pp. 660-686.
Benigno V., Chiorri C., Chifari A., & Manca S. (2013). Adattamento italiano della Intrapersonal Technology Integration Scale. Uno strumento per misurare gliatteggiamenti degli insegnanti nei confronti delle ICT. Giornale italiano di psicologia, XL(4), pp. 815-835
Berrett, B., Murphy, J., & Sullivan, J. (2012). Administrator insights and reflections: Technology integration in schools. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 200-221. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1815
Birch A., Irvine V. (2009), “Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model”, Educational media international, 46(4): 295-315
Booth, T., Ainscow, M., & Dovigo, F. (2014). Nuovo Index per l'inclusione: percorsi di apprendimento e partecipazione a scuola. Carocci.
Colicchi, E. (2021), I valori in educazione e in pedagogia, Carocci Editore: Roma
Compeau D.R., & Higgins C.A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), pp. 118-142
Consiglio Europeo (2014). Council conclusions of 20 May 2014 on effective teacher education. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014XG0614(05)&from=EN
Cullen, T. A., & Greene, B. A. (2011). Preservice teachers' beliefs, attitudes, and motivation about technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research,45(1), 29-47.
Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of ComputerTechnology: A comparison of two Theoretical Models. Management Science,35(8), pp. 982-1002.
Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1992), Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14),pp. 319-339
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182.
Di Tore, S. (2022), Dal metaverso alla stampa 3D: Prospettive semplesse della didattica innovativa. Roma Studium edizioni ISBN:978-88-382-5270-9
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Longman
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D. and Miniard, P.W. (1995). Consumer Behavior. The Dryden Press, Forth Worth, Texas.
European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education (EASNIE) (2012). Teacher education for inclusion. Profile of inclusive teachers. Estratto da: https://www.european-agency.org
Ferraris, M. (2021). Post Coronial Studies. Giulio Einaudi Editore: Torino.
Gui, M. (2010). L’uso didattico delle ICT. In A. Cavalli, G. Argentin (Eds.), Gli in-segnanti italiani: come cambia il modo di fare scuola. Terza indagine dell’IstitutoIARD sulle condizioni di vita e di lavoro degli insegnanti italiani (pp. 1-17).Bologna: Il Mulino
Lent R.W., Brown S.D., & Hackett G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, pp. 79-121
Lewin, K. (1936). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 84(5), 612-613.
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message. New York, 123(1), 126-128.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age.
Muscarà, M., & Messina, R. (2015). Perceived competency, perceived ICT usufulness in classroom and teachers training models. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, (13), 181–196. Retrieved from https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.ph
OCSE (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Vol. 1): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing
Parlamento Europeo e Consiglio (2006). Raccomandazione del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio del 18 dicembre 2006 relativa a competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006H0962&from=EN
Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza – Next Generatione EUItalia-30 aprile 2021 disponibile: https://www.governo.it/sites/governo.it/files/PNRR.pdf
Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of research on computing in education, 33(4), 413-430.
Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg, LU: Publications Office of the European Union.
Radovan M., Kristl N. (2017), “Acceptance of Technology and Its Impact on Teachers’ Activities in Virtual Classroom: Integrating UTAUT and CoI into a Combined Model”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(3): 11-22.
Rheinberg, F. (2006), Valutare la motivazione. Strumenti per l'analisi dei processi motivazionali. Il Mulino: Bologna
Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Sibilio, M. (2020). L’interazione didattica. Brescia: Scholé.
Smith S. (2002). Using the social cognitive model to explain vocational interest ininformation technology. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20(1), pp. 56–65
Tezci E. (2011). Factors that influence pre-service teacher’s ICT usage in education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), pp. 483-499
UN. United Nations (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020.pdf (ver. 15.04.2021).
Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(2), 246.
Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”, MIS quarterly, 27(3): 425-478.
Verhagen, T., Feldberg, F., Van Den Hooff, B., & Meents, S. (2009, June). Understanding virtual world usage: A multipurpose model and empirical testing. In ECIS (pp. 761-775).
Vroom,V.H. (1964), Work and Motivation, John Wileyand Sons, New York, NY.
Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. The Journal of experimental education, 75(3), 167-202.
WHO.World Health Organization (2011). World Report on Disability.Geneva: World Health Organization.
Zurru, A. L. (2022). In che senso è possibile innovare a scuola attraverso la Didattica Speciale?. Education Sciences & Society-Open Access, 13(2).
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 ilaria Viola
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
